#Html image cleaner style professional#

This document was produced by a group operating under the W3C Patent Policy. It is inappropriate to cite this document as other than work in progress. This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. Publication as a Working Draft does not imply endorsement by W3C and its Members. This document is intended to become a W3C Recommendation. This document was published by the Media Working Group as a Working Draft using the Recommendation No decision has been taken on the outcome of these issues including whether they are valid. This draft highlights some of the pending issues that are still to be discussed in the working group. Alternatively, you can send comments to the Media Working GroupвЂ™s mailing-list, ( archives). GitHub Issues are preferred for discussion on this specification. ДЇeedback and comments on this specification are welcome. A list of current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical report can be found in the W3C technical reports index at. This may require the spilled material being removed and taken to a licensed facility for treatment,вЂќ it said.This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. вЂњWhere a slurry spill occurs on a road, the priority is to contain the spill to prevent contamination to local water bodies. вЂњGenerally, spills on public roads are a matter for local authorities, which have powers of enforcement under the Roads Act 1993. Responding, it said there is no national guidance for farmers on this issue.

#Html image cleaner style professional#

The Farming Independent contacted the Local Government Management Agency, a State agency that provides a range of professional services to local authorities, to outline what farmers and contractors should do if public roads get dirty during agricultural activity. вЂSpills on public roads a matter for local authoritiesвЂ™ If you donвЂ™t clean the road, you could be fined for leaving it dirty, so what are you supposed to do?вЂќДЄt the time of going to press, there was no response from Limerick Council. Looking back on it, we are still convinced we were right to clean the road because that is what we always do. The McGrath family said: вЂњWe are delighted that the conviction has been overturned. On the day, the council agreed to allow the appeal as the councilвЂ™s costs had been discharged.

The guilty verdict was overturned,вЂќ said Mr Cooke. вЂњThe appeal was allowed on consent (by Limerick City and County Council). Mr Cooke, solicitor for Mr McGrath, confirmed they did appeal the matter to the circuit court. They said they used water to sweep clay - that was picked up on tractor tyres - off the road.ДЇollowing the judgeвЂ™s verdict in Kilmallock Court, recognisance was fixed in the event of an appeal. They said that you do not drive on slurry while spreading it and that there couldnвЂ™t be any drips from a slurry tank on to the road because they are вЂњcompletely watertight and sealedвЂќ. Mr McGrath and his brother Seamus both denied this. The council and a witness alleged that, in cleaning the road, slurry was washed into a gully and into a stream. The crux of the case concerned Mr McGrath cleaning a road after spreading slurry for a client in the Herbertstown area. Due to Mr McGrathвЂ™s good record, Judge Harney imposed a more вЂњrealisticвЂќ fine of в‚¬250. The maximum fine a judge can impose for the water pollution offence is в‚¬3,000.

She ordered he pay the councilвЂ™s costs of в‚¬2,000.

Mr McGrath was defended by David OвЂ™Regan BL and instructed by solicitor John Cooke.ДЇollowing a lengthy contested hearing, Judge Patricia Harney found Mr McGrath guilty of allowing polluting matters to enter waters, but not guilty of failing to report it because he вЂњdid not believeвЂќ he did anything wrong. The case was taken by Limerick City and County Council, represented by solicitor Will Leahy. Last October, Brendan McGrath of Knockainey pleaded not guilty at Kilmallock Court to two offences under the Water Pollution Act. A conviction against a Limerick agricultural contractor for water pollution has been overturned on appeal.